The article likewise seems to discard the importance of money in favor of three other more immaterial factors, but I do not think this is representative of the situation of the global job market right now. I do not disagree with your take, but I think you may only be speaking for a subset of engineers that are already fairly well compensated. I'm happy being hire number 13, or 99, and working with people I like doing work I find value in. If money was a motivator I'd be serially founding companies and striving to be The Next Big Thing. I imagine there are a lot of early career (26-30 year old) software engineers who are in a similar boat. More money would be _nice_, and I imagine I'd be singing a slightly different song if I had kids, but it's much less important than knowing the work that I do has meaning and an immediate impact on the world, and about as important as working with new/interesting technology.

I have enough for a down payment on a house, I meet my expenses for the month with 1/2 of one paycheck, I can buy a new car on a credit card if I wanted to. Yes I could quit and get a ~20k raise by shopping my resume around, but I don't need the money.

>Is an extra $10k per year worth learning a new org, a new skillset, a new set of expectations, a new set of coworkers, and a new boss? This bit from the author hits the nail on the head: There comes a point where the money just isn't a motivating factor anymore, and companies are struggling to figure out how to work in that environment.

Tell me why we should hire you reddit